The Body Inside Your Body is Not Your Body

The Body Inside Your Body is Not Your Body

Writen by Joel Ohman, Executive Director of AbortionFacts.com and author of the bestselling (and controversial) Other Bodies, a secular fiction book that presents the Christian pro-life viewpoint in compelling Young Adult thriller form.

Pregnancy is beautiful, powerful, amazing. Where there was one, now there is two. God creates, and in His astonishing generosity, He grants women the opportunity to share in this new, generative, life-forming process.

A new life begins.

A new body is formed.

But with this wonderful opportunity comes weighty responsibility, because beginning at conception, every pregnancy involves two or more bodies.

No matter how you spin it, women don’t have four arms and four legs when they’re pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them.

The slogan, “My Body, My Choice,” betrays a tragic misunderstanding of what is taking place inside the womb. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother’s body.

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother’s body.

It’s a hard truth for many to hear though.

The body inside your body is not your body.

Sometimes the best way to communicate hard truths is to do so in story form. Aesop used fables. Jesus used parables. Even the nursery rhymes of “Mother Goose” contain deeper, sometimes darker meanings.

So, I wrote a book.

It wouldn’t be my first time. I’ve written the #1 bestselling YA dystopian trilogy, Meritropolis, so I was well aware of the process, and I love to write, so that wasn’t the issue, and yet…

I didn’t want to write this book. I fought it, but the idea kept growing inside of me, and it wouldn’t leave me alone. It was a crazy idea, really. But, when I tried to sleep, it whispered to me. When I tried to write something else, it tugged on the peripheries of my consciousness, daring me to look it in the eye. If I were to do so, I knew what it would mean though. Career suicide, most likely. Too controversial. Too ambitious. Delusional, really.

Let’s be honest; I’m a middle-aged, white guy writing a book about abortion, set in the inner city, and told from the POV of a young girl, all in a dystopian, futuristic America that’s eerily similar in many ways to the world we find ourselves in today. Not to mention, there are complicated issues of reproductive rights, teenage pregnancy, feminism, classism, assisted suicide. One could be forgiven for thinking I’m in way over my head.

And then there’s the hate mail. If I can be transparent, I like getting emails from my readers at 3 a.m., telling me they stayed up late, reading my books, and then, in all caps, WHEN IS THE NEXT BOOK COMING OUT? Those emails are nice. The emails (and reviews) that are not so nice are the ones where I’m accused of being a lunatic, fundamentalist, backward, woman-hating, white-privileged, out-of-touch cis-male Christian. And those are just the words that I can print. The other adjectives are … even less nice.

But the idea was still there, tempting me, taunting me to look it square in the eye and just describe it for what it was: a hard truth about a hard, broken world. I don’t claim to have all the answers, and what answers I might have are not easy. But I think we can do better; we have to do better. I’m a Christian, so the words in the Bible, the words Jesus says, they mean something to me, of course—because I know him. I know what he’s done for me, given his very body for me—he has made the ultimate sacrifice for all other bodies—and I have the simple joy just to say he knows me. And yet, the truth of this idea, it seemed to be so fundamentally basic that we can all agree on it, whether believer or unbeliever, atheist, agnostic, searcher, dreamer, or skeptic.

The hard truth is this: the body inside your body is not your body.

That’s it. When coupled with the truth implicit in all civilized society—we don’t harm other bodies—then even the most atheistic naturalist among us has to admit, when we look at the ultrasound—even a young child knows; we all know—there’s another body in there. Where there was one, now, there are two. So, to delude ourselves into thinking it’s just my body, my choice betrays a tragic misunderstanding of reality.

To intentionally harm either of the bodies, mother or child, is wrong. Point blank.

But what if the pregnancy might do harm to the mother’s body? Of course, when two lives are threatened and only one can be saved, doctors must always save that life. But, if it is merely an inconvenience and not life-threatening, then the right to not be killed supersedes the right to not be pregnant. It is reasonable for society to expect an adult to live temporarily with an inconvenience if the only alternative is doing permanent and fatal harm to another innocent human body.

But what about rape, incest, or disability? Since none of these circumstances are sufficient to justify harming another innocent human body after birth, they’re not sufficient to justify harming an innocent human body before birth.

The body inside your body is not your body.

We don’t harm other bodies.

And, if being a feminist means believing that we are all equal—different but no less equal—then how can one claim to stand for women everywhere while refusing to stand for the little one inside of her?

That’s the hard truth. I’ve done my part. I’ve told the story. I’ve told the truth. I can sleep at night now.

Can you?

Because…
Because love lets live.
Because everybody matters.
Because we don’t harm other bodies.
Because the body inside your body is not your body.
Because babies are babies whether they’re inside or out.
Because babies are babies whether they’re wanted or not…

I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.
Psalm 139:14

4 thoughts on “The Body Inside Your Body is Not Your Body

  1. It does anger me how many of the radical feminists make excuses like “my body my choice” because it is another being altogether! They completely deny that it’s NOT about them when they have a child inside of them, it’s about the best interests of the child. I understand why people feel certain circumstances, just as life threatening ones could justify such a horrible thing, but abortion out of pure convenience? Disgusting, and amazing how many women can literally justify killing another human being just for their own convenience! but then again, many treat their already born children as pure burdens and raise them to be just as self centered! Sad society sees the unborn as parasites and not blessings! I hate too, how many pro-choice people make a strawman that pro-life people are out to subjugate women because women can get pregnant and not men and its somehow “liberating” for a woman to choose to end her pregnancy to be more like a man… This was never about women’s rights to their own body, because the whole matter revolves around someone else’s body and their right to life! Women just happen to be in the picture since their body hosts the other, but separate entities should have separate rights… The whole controversy speaks to a society that treats children as commodities and literal property! And worships convenience at all costs, even killing another human being….

  2. I’ve always been pro choice because I truly believe in freedom of choice in all areas of life but not when your choice infringes upon or harms another individual. It seems everyone always comes up with so many what if scenarios in order to justify their decision. My college roommate became pregnant our freshman year of University and although we tried to talk her out of it and offer different solutions. Sadly she had an abortion over Christmas break It was so heartbreaking especially because the reason she had the abortion was because she wasn’t ready (I don’t know anyone who is ). My aunt is a truly strong individual she was sexuality assaulted at the age of 16 and became pregnant but by the grace of God she chose to keep her daughter and now that daughter has two beautiful children of her own. I have many stories of strong and steadfast women who chose the life of a child instead of convenience.

  3. I am against abortion, as I have suffered the pain of 3 miscarriages. Many women who have been told that the baby is “incompatible with life” still choose with the pregnancy, even though they know that the baby will be stillborn or pass shortly after birth. We made a hard decision to have our intellectually disabled daughter on birth control because that there are always men who can take advantage of her. I would never want her to go through the trauma of abortion.

  4. To me it is very simple as you say a pregnant woman’s body contains another human who is equally worthy of our respect as a separate God created soul.

    There are medical circumstances where it is impossible for the child to survive and where medical interventions must therefore prioritise the mother. But there are NO excuses for the deliberate killing of a child in the womb.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *