$36 Million Study Proves Women are Weaker Than Men

$36 Million Study Proves Women are Weaker Than Men

army-1446021_960_720

Can you tell in the picture above which one is a male soldier and which one is a female soldier? If you can, you are smarter than the current Navy Secretary and Marine Corps. If you were in a dangerous situation, which one would you want to see coming to help you? On Special Report with Bret Baier, Brett had a special on the “The Changing Face of US Military.” The Marine Corps chose the best Sports Medicine and Physiological Department University in the country to see how women were doing in the military. The study came out with: “The current study demonstrated female soldiers are significantly different from male soldiers.” The military spent $36 million to find out that women are weaker than men as if this was news. Women can somehow be in the military but not be strong enough to play in an NFL game! The ignorance in all of this is astounding and corrupt.

The study found that females didn’t move as quickly or shoot as accurately as male marines. Women were twice as likely to suffer injuries from carrying heavy loads. The Navy Secretary Ray Mabus rejected these findings, however, and compared it to finally allowing black male soldiers in the military long ago. He used the example of black male men who are strong and powerful to prove that this did not weaken the military, so it should be no different with females who are much weaker and fragile. (Do you see how little, if any, wisdom there is with these people? It’s tragic when their world view affects the military’s readiness and makes us all more unsafe.)

One woman who clearly understood the harm of having women in the military added the “thorny problem of sexual attraction” and “women have a much harder time meeting the demands of combat.” Any person who does not care about being politically correct and cares more about the country’s safety would see the damage this thinking has caused in our military and on women. Women do not belong in the military. Period. Do you care more about political correctness or safety? Are you one whose desire is so strong that you will manipulate anything to prove men and women are exactly the same, even rejecting a $36 million study like the Navy Secretary did?

All of you who love the Lord, value the way He made you and the way He made men, especially your husband. Understand the differences and the roles He gave to each. Men are built to be the providers and protectors and is God’s beautiful plan for humanity. Don’t fight His plan. He wants women to “marry, bear children, and guide the home.” If you are single, shine Jesus whatever you do and bring glory to Him. He wants us to love being feminine and being a help meet to our husbands. No, we can’t force other women to accept our ideas (God’s plan) but we can model it to them and be joyful in the process. We can learn “godliness with contentment is great gain” and make our homes a haven of peace and rest for our families and others. Yes, this isn’t our final destination here on earth and many will not chose to honor the Lord with the way they live but all who love Him sure will.

For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.
1 Corinthians 3:19

***My first unprofessional YouTube: Christian Wives Being Obedient to Their Husbands.

19 thoughts on “$36 Million Study Proves Women are Weaker Than Men

  1. I agree about women in the military….it goes against all logic and reality to expect that women can fight the same way men can. (And then there are a host of other issues as well.)

    My husband and I have already talked about what to do if Congress decides to require women to register for the Selective Service. I looked into the legal issues surrounding it and settled upon a course of action. And the entire time I was thinking, “I can’t believe this is even a possibility now.”

  2. We would all love to know what your course of action is, Polly, since many young mothers don’t want their daughters to have to register for the Selective Service.

  3. Amen, Lori. This has been a terribly frustrating and saddening issue – the complete ignoring of reality in favor of promoting a false worldview.

  4. What a silly study and a waste of money. If they read and believed I Peter 3:7 and Psalm 111:10 {regarding giving honour unto the wife as the weaker vessel and the fear of the Lord being the beginning of wisdom}, they sure could have saved a whole lot of money!

    The fact that women are in the military is just one of many reasons men don’t give honour unto women as the weaker vessel. Yet another thing we have to “thank” feminism for. I fully agree that women do not belong in the military at all.

  5. We must remember who is behind it all, Diana: the enemy of our souls. He will do anything to blind people and cause them to believe in lies. All of this further disintegrates the family as mothers are deciding to be in the military and leave their families for months at a time. Add in the sexual attraction and it’s a recipe for disaster. It’s tragic.

  6. I originally had in the post that all they would have had to do is read the Bible where it states that woman is the weaker vessel but I took it out last minute. Many women want to be the same as men in every way, including their power and strength, and it is a jealousy issue that they best get over since it will never happen. It shows the foolishness of those in authority of our country.

  7. Are your sons in the military. Bear in mind, someone has to defend us, and not enough young men are stepping forward. They are letting women defend them.

  8. Though I disagree with you in that I don’t have a problem with women with school age children working a job outside the home, I’m with you on this one. It’s not just about physical strength. If a woman were to be captured by the enemy… I won’t even go there with what could happen to her.
    Also, the military involves being away for extended periods of time. I wouldn’t be crazy about my man being shut up on a submarine for months with women. Women have been known to come off those subs pregnant and not even know who the “baby daddy” is. My cousin was in the Navy. It happens.

  9. That has nothing to do with it. It has to do with being politically correct and feminism getting their rights and being “equal” with men in every way.

  10. Such a shame how much money was spent to conduct this study! I can relate to this post somewhat. My dad is a firefighter so during high school he urged me to join a firefighter program designed for youth. It was physically challenging even after the standards had been lowered for women.

    When I was closing in on 18, the fire department offered to pay for my schooling in order to hire me, but dad took me aside and said, “I’m not saying you can’t do this, because you can. I just don’t want you too.” I listened and never argued with him. In hindsight, I see dad used it as a way to monitor my teenage extracurricular activities, and without him saying so, he didn’t want me to mix with men in this fashion.

    I also remember thinking that although it was gentlemanly of the men to offer their hand when I was stepping off a fire truck, it felt odd because my presence interfered with the tasks at hand. When a woman needs help, what does a man naturally do? He reaches out to help her. In the few seconds it took them to help me, they could have already been off saving a life.

  11. Exactly, Holly. Women in the battle field will undoubtedly prevent the men from doing what they are called to do so they can help the women around them who are not nearly as strong.

  12. LOVE your youtube video, Lori! Keep them coming! It was sincere and friendly and I felt like I was chatting with a girlfriend over coffee. You give such wise advice, and it was so nice to “meet” you after following your blog for so long.
    Great job and please do more!!

  13. The thing I wish I could tell every women considering going into combat is this, you are being incredibly selfish. My husband is in the military and I know many women in the military (not in a combat unit). All of them consider themselves to be patriotic and serving a higher purpose. What those women who desire to go into combat don’t seem to realize is this, that a truly patriotic woman would never in a million years put herself in combat unless it could be proved that her presence there would BENEFIT the unit. If there was even a suspicion that her presence there would harm the unit (and that has been pretty well proven now in many ways) then SHE would be the one saying, no way, I won’t do it. It is incredibly selfish for these women to put their personal political agenda, or career advancement prospects, ahead of the lives of their fellow soldiers.

  14. I agree on this one, Lori. It is especially bothersome that the government was comparing allowing women in the military with allowing black men. Race and gender/sex are not now, nor have they ever been treated as equivalents in our legal system. With the passage of the civil rights act, separation by race (rightly) came to an end. But separation by sex has persisted for the past fifty years, and for good reason. Comparing race discrimination to sex discrimination is like comparing apples and oranges, legally. It is a false comparison. Race, in our system, always gets strict legal scrutiny, sex does not (nor should it). Under the civil rights act, public accommodations (restaurants, hotels, etc.) are not allowed to discriminate based on race, but there is no prohibition from discriminating based on sex (businesses can chose to cater to women). Our civil rights laws do not treat race and sex as functional equivalents, and neither should our military.

  15. You’ve helped change my way of thinking with your posts. Years ago I would have said of course women should be in the military but now I agree with you. Women ARE different and therefore should be doing different things. To pretend otherwise isn’t being truthful to yourself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *